Book of the Month, May – The Man in the High Castle by Philip K. Dick

Posted in Book of the Month on May 29, 2012 by Ross Lucksinger

[See the Lucky's Corner Book of the Month Page for previous selections.]

Philip K. Dick makes me wonder about the brilliant, unique minds we’ve missed and will never access because they’re just one step further removed from our collective understanding of reality.

He straddled that line. He produced works of mind-bending fiction because to him they were not so mind-bending. The alternate realities were not so “alternate.” He was as much reporting on his true perception as much as he was inventing settings. Hell, by the end he literally believed the entire world was caught in a time loop that started in roughly 50 A.D.

But for most of his life one foot was planted in our world. One more step and those stories would have remained locked in his mind because he would have been unable to communicate what he saw. How many were like Dick, except we could not experience their vision because they were so far gone that no common reference points remained?

*shrug* Pointless supposition, I guess. But for the 53 years he lived we were given access to the worlds of Philip K. Dick and one of the finest of his shifting realities to experience is The Man in the High Castle.

Written in 1962, the book helped establish the modern definition of alternate history fiction. As was often the case with Dick, it transcended the genre it defined. The Man in the High Castle is actually an example of “alternate-alternate” history.

In the book, the U.S. lost World War II and control of the country is split between Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany, a pair of super-powers now engaged in a cold war. However, during the story various characters read a banned book, The Grasshopper Lies Heavy, which itself is a piece of alternate history fiction based on the idea that the U.S. and Allied powers won World War II. As the story progresses, several characters begin to suspect that their world may not be the “real” version of reality.

It’s an exploration of fate, layers of reality and personal determination. Perhaps more importantly, it may be the most accessible glimpse at the world in which Philip K. Dick lived.

Next Month’s Book
The Book of Five Rings by Miyamoto Musashi (Amazon link)

Book of the Month, April – Romantically Apocalyptic by Vitaly S. Alexius

Posted in Book of the Month on April 17, 2012 by Ross Lucksinger

[See the Lucky's Corner Book of the Month Page for previous selections.]

I have a special place in my heart for any work of fiction that is fully committed to its premise, even to a ridiculous degree.

No, especially those which take it to a ridiculous degree, from the completeness of World War Z – retelling a fake zombie war as thoroughly as a historian would dissect an actual conflict – to Robert Zemeckis’ film Who Framed Roger Rabbit, which rather than slapping in cartoon characters for simple comedic value instead builds an entire framework for this fantasy universe involving the day-to-day lives of the ‘toons.’

Such is the case with Romantically Apocalyptic.

It’s a graphic novel created by Vitaly S. Alexius, a supremely talented Toronto artist originally from Russia. The story is set in post-apocalyptic New York, where three unnamed and faceless (due to their gas masks) protagonists survive. Every scene is crafted with care. Hours go into rendering each image. Layers of paintings, landscape photographs, green screen work, and digital effects are meticulously added together to create stunning, breathtaking vistas…

…in order to make the simplest jokes possible.

War-torn buildings are juxtaposed with an argument with a skeleton.

Brilliant paintings set up a pithy line from the “Captain.”

I perhaps enjoy most when the Captain and the Pilot find an old DVD copy of Titanic. It’s silly, yes, but the simplicity of their actions speaks to our search for joy in a bleak world. They are unconcerned with the hellscape that surrounds them. They just live.

Romantically Apocalyptic: surprising depth from simple jokes and simple joys.

Next Month’s Book:
The Man in the High Castle by Philip K. Dick (Amazon Link)

Book of the Month, March – Ideas and Opinions by Albert Einstein

Posted in Book of the Month on March 30, 2012 by Ross Lucksinger

[See the Lucky's Corner Book of the Month Page for previous selections.]

Though he would disagree (and made a point to on many occasions), the modern world has not seen a more accomplished intellectual, scientist, and visionary than Albert Einstein. And there is no more complete look into his mind than Ideas and Opinions.

Gathered under Einstein’s supervision, this collection of papers offer fascinating insight into his thinking, far beyond even physics and politics. (His thoughts on mankind moving into the “third phase of religion” are particularly interesting.) The collection is useful even if you’re just looking for his writings on a single topic. The papers are split into five sections. The first, also titled Ideas and Opinions, covers a general array of topics, including freedom, religion, and education. The second is On Politics, Government, and Pacifism, much of which is centered on his desire for a supra-national government to prevent the destruction of our species through nuclear weapons. Then comes On the Jewish People, followed by On Germany, and finally Contributions to Science, which deals with the meat of relativity and his work in physics.

Each topic is worth exploring. The only complaint with the work is it at times becomes redundant due to how comprehensive the collection is and it could have been edited to provide greater impact. (Some of his most powerful words are hidden amongst a clutter of papers that repeat what has already been said.)

But I doubt he would have been offended by such a complaint. One thing he desired for his legacy was that his words not become sacrosanct. He’s known for his brilliance but, considering his accomplishments, his humility might be his most impressive quality. This can be found in one of my favorite quotations from the book, which occurs in the second paper presented, titled “My First Impressions of the U.S.A.” He provides a good lesson for any human in danger of becoming enamored with their own image:

The cult of individuals is always, in my view, unjustified. To be sure, nature distributes her gifts unevenly among her children. But there are plenty of the well-endowed, thank God, and I am firmly convinced that most of them live quiet, unobtrusive lives. It strikes me as unfair, and even in bad taste, to select a few of them for boundless admiration, attributing super-human powers of mind and character to them. This has been my fate, and the contrast between the popular estimate of my powers and achievements and the reality is simply grotesque. The awareness of this strange state of affairs would be unbearable but for one pleasing consolation: it is a welcome symptom in an age which is commonly denounced as materialistic, that it makes heroes of men whose goals lie wholly in the intellectual and moral sphere. This proves that knowledge and justice are ranked above wealth and power by a large section of the human race. My experience teaches me that this idealistic outlook is particularly prevalent in America, which is decried as a singularly materialistic country. After this digression I come to my proper theme, in the hope that no more weight will be attached to my modest remarks than they deserve.

Next Month’s Book:
Romantically Apocalyptic by Vitaly S. Alexius (Purchase Link)

Return to Inside Texas

Posted in Sports on March 5, 2012 by Ross Lucksinger

The biography of Tex is written. Now for the lengthy publishing process. I’ll keep y’all posted and make an announcement when the book is printed and a release date has been set.

In the meantime, I’ve returned to Inside Texas as the editor. From IT owner Clendon Ross’ release:

…Ross Lucksinger returns to Inside Texas as InsideTexas.com Editor following a year spent writing a book on his grandfather, former Texas swim coach Tex Robertson. Ross will continue as a feature contributor and will also manage and edit the content at InsideTexas.com and return as host of the Inside Texas Podcast, which will resume on a bi-weekly schedule immediately…

Book of the Month, February – No Country for Old Men by Cormac McCarthy

Posted in Book of the Month on February 27, 2012 by Ross Lucksinger

I sent one boy to the gaschamber at Huntsville. One and only one. My arrest and my testimony. I went up there and visited with him two or three times. Three times. The last time was the day of his execution. I didnt have to go but I did. I sure didnt want to. He’d killed a fourteen year old girl and I can tell you right now I never did have no great desire to visit with him let alone go to his execution but I done it. The papers said it was a crime of passion and he told me there wasnt no passion to it. He’d been datin this girl, young as she was. He was nineteen. And he told me that he had been plannin to kill somebody for about as long as he could remember. Said that if they turned him out he’d do it again. Said he knew he was goin to hell. Told it to me out of his own mouth. I dont know what to make of that. I surely dont.

Cormac McCarthy’s opening passage of No Country for Old Men perfectly sets the tone for one of his finest novels by properly preparing the audience for the desperation of Sheriff Ed Tom Bell’s hopeless manhunt and for the concept of an incomprehensibly evil mind.

One of the hallmarks of McCarthy’s style is his noted lack of punctuation, but it’s the few elements of punctuation that he does include that establishes the flow of the novel and captures Bell’s manner of speech with subtly and grace. McCarthy doesn’t drop apostrophes entirely, as the second appearance of “didnt” is followed by a contraction (“He’d”) that does make use of the punctuation. Instead of simply removing an apostrophe in all instances, the lack of it in “didnt” displays the subtle difference of the West Texas pronounciation. He doesn’t rely on overly exaggerated spellings that distract the audience, interrupt the flow of the work, and conjure the image of a one-dimensional stereotype.

Let’s compare McCarthy’s opening to a less artful approach attempted by Neal Stephenson in Cryptonomican:

“Ah figgered you ‘n’ ah’ud have plenny a tahm to chew the rag,” Amy says, having reverted utterly to the tongue of her ancestors in the last couple of days. “But it has been ages and ages since I saw those two boys, and you’ve never seen ‘em at all.”

I’ve previously noted that I am very, very much a fan of Stephenson’s work, but he’s justifiably famous for brilliant and exquisitely detailed exposition and not for nuanced dialog.

Conversely, McCarthy’s style has a natural flow. But his style can also be bracing for those who have not previously encountered it. This is why No Country for Old Men is a good entry point for someone who has never read any of his novels. It is McCarthy’s fifth book set on the plains of West Texas, but unlike the others it has a much more contemporary setting and is structured around a more familiar chase drama. The popularity of the Coen brothers’ film adaptation also helps.

If you’ve seen the movie, do not expect any surprises in the story. The adaptation was near direct. As you read the opening monologue you’re likely to hear Tommy Lee Jones’ voice in your head. But something that can be gained from the book is a much more clear understanding of character motivation, tone, and theme.

Many people criticized the seemingly sudden ending of the movie, which cut straight past to final showdown between Llewelyn Moss (Josh Brolin) and Anton Chigurh (Jarvier Bardem) and eventually ends with Bell (Jones) telling his wife about a dream. The movie ends at the conclusion of Bell’s description, much to the confusion of many audience-goers. However, “the chase” is such a common trope in film that most people mistook Llewelyn for the main character. He is not. Bell is the main character, and the desperation of his fight against forces beyond his control forms the thematic scaffolding of the entire work.

Even if you’ve seen the movie, go ahead and pick up McCarthy’s original novel. You may find yourself quickly obsessed with reading all the other novels of one of the finest, most brilliant, why-the-hell-isn’t-he-a-nobel-laureate-I’m-looking-at-you-Royal-Swedish-Academy-of-Sciences authors of our time.

Next Month’s Book:
Ideas and Opinions by Albert Einstein (Amazon Link)

Ricky Retires

Posted in Sports on February 8, 2012 by Ross Lucksinger

Ricky Williams retired yesterday.

Incidentally, the photo used for the above-linked Mike Blackwell column is cropped from a personal one I took with Ricky:

That photo is from 2008 (holy hell, did I look that young just four years ago?), when I met Ricky to write a feature story on him for Inside Texas Magazine. For 45 minutes we sat and talked. Weed never came up. Instead we bounced between a broad myriad of topics, including Discordian philosophy, his fascination with Hinduism, and his world travel.

His mind is beautiful. It’s still my favorite interview I’ve conducted as a journalist. The story I wrote is still my favorite work I’ve ever published. [It was republished on InsideTexas.com in 2010. Click here to read it.]

Good luck to Ricky in the next phase of his life. I predict it to be as equally unpredictable — and interesting — as the football phase.

Mass Effect: Deception – a Lesson in Quality Control

Posted in Sci-Fi on February 6, 2012 by Ross Lucksinger

I’ve watched with great interest the wailing and gnashing of teeth over the ironically titled book, Mass Effect: Deception. The ten-peso version of the controversy is Del Ray Books published a series of novels set in the universe of the video game Mass Effect. A significant number of major release video games get novel treatment and Mass Effect is no different, with four books written under the title. The three previous books were each written by Bioware staff writer Drew Karpyshyn, but the task of writing the fourth and final book in the series, Mass Effect: Deception, was instead given to science fiction author William C. Dietz. But unlike Karpyshyn’s books, Dietz’ novel is full of inconsistencies with the established canon of the Mass Effect universe.

Normally this sort of controversy wouldn’t be worth noting. Science fiction accuracy debates – and adjoining nerd rage – are a tediously common occurrence on the Internet.

But this one is unique. The author’s errors – cataloged by fans here – are so fascinatingly bad. We’re talking queer erasure and ableism bad.

Gillian Grayson is the name of one of the main characters. (That’s her on the cover.) She’s autistic. Or, at least, she was as a 12-year-old in Mass Effect: Ascension. In Deception, she’s 18 (even though the book takes place three years later) and, turns out, her autism was apparently an adolescent phase she has “gotten over.”

Huh.

Hendel Mitra, another character in the novels, is the only homosexual character in the series. In Deception, Mitra is, for some reason, identified as heterosexual and promptly killed off.

The mistakes were so glaring that Bioware and Del Ray announced that another edition of the book would be released with “a number” of changes.

That’s the gist of what happened. But, as a writer, what interests me so much more is figuring out how this happened.

The company outsourced this project to Dietz in the first place because Karpyshyn was busy working here in Austin on Bioware’s new multiplayer RPG, Star Wars: The Old Republic. There was nothing remotely unusual about this move, as Dietz is no stranger to adaptation. He’s previously written tie-in novels to Star Wars, Halo, Hitman, Resistance, and Starcraft. This is what Dietz does. He churns out product. When asked about the negative reviews his book Halo: The Flood received, Dietz said:

“I haven’t read all of the reviews of Halo: The Flood – there’s so many! But of those that I have read, the negative ones often say something to the effect that the book is just like the game, so why read it? What those readers may not realize is that I was hired to novelize the game. That means taking the game and turning it into a book. Which is different from writing a completely new tie-in story like the books Mr. (Eric) Nylund wrote. Or, put another way, I did what I was hired to do.”

I’m reminded of the quote from Alec Baldwin on why he’s previously accepted roles for movies he knew were going to be terrible:

“I needed to make a living. People don’t realize actors are like plumbers. When you invite a plumber to your house and say, ‘I want you to put this sink in my bathroom,’ the plumber doesn’t say, ‘I’m not going to install that sink, it’s hideous. You have the worst taste in sinks!’ No, he just says, ‘OK,’ and he puts it in.”

You give William Dietz a setting and a basic plot-line and he can quickly bang you out a story containing all the requisite elements. Yet none of his previous adapted works contain anywhere approaching the number of errors found in Mass Effect: Deception.

I don’t know Dietz. I don’t know the specifics of how he adapts a work. But the debacle makes me suspect that his other tie-in novels were submitted back to their respective video game companies with the same level of inconsistency.

That’s not a problem. That’s where quality control comes in. The book is copy-edited but obviously not content-edited.

So what should have happened? As much as he may be getting roasted by fans, most of the blame doesn’t fall on Dietz. Mass Effect is Bioware’s license and it’s their responsibility to handle lore consistency. Dietz’ primary failure is rather with the basic narrative consistency that exists within the work itself.

As a science fiction author, he should have been able to handle the basic physics. I don’t expect you to know going in how the nervous system of a Krogan functions (incidentally, it functions in no way like Dietz describes in Deception). What I do expect is for you to understand that beryllium is highly toxic (IARC Group 1) and, ergo, makes for a poor hand-exchanged currency.

And maybe read the previous books in the series to figure out if one of your main characters is autistic. Pro-tip, there.

It’s fine that he’s not obsessed with the details of Mass Effect. He doesn’t need to be in order to write a good book. But he should have at least sent an advance reader copy to someone who is, such as a member of the Mass Effect Wiki community, and made the necessary changes – like, say, having the opening scene of the book take place on a planet humans could feasibly walk around on.

At this point, it should have been thoroughly reviewed by the creators of the original game. This clearly did not happen. At the time, game director Casey Hudson and the writing staff were in the thick of creating Mass Effect 3. Hudson claims via Twitter that he reviewed the book, but that review couldn’t have been very stringent.

William Dietz is an accomplished writer. He’s not new to this game, and he deserves credit for being a military sci-fi writer who was actually a member of a military (U.S. Navy medic).

But regardless of the circumstances or intentions, the result was he, Casey Hudson, Bioware, and EA putting their names on a book in which the series’ only gay character was made straight and a girl’s autism was just a phase she got over.

Quality control, folks. Works wonders.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.